Dear Friends,
It is very interesting
to see the difference between what Mr. Sparks wrote on The Ministry in 1926 and what he wrote in 1953, after a gap
of 27 years. For a comparison, I would like to refer to his article in A Witness and a Testimony
reproduced in the article titled, The
Nature and Purpose of this Ministry: (http://www.austin-sparks.net/english/004211.html)
As I see it, the
essential difference between his ministry at the very beginning and its
subsequent enlargement after a period of 27 years, lay in his vision of the
things of Christ. When Mr. Sparks began his ministry there was a need to
emphasize our identification with the death, resurrection, ascension and
enthronement of Christ, as was then prevalent in most evangelical churches. In
the words of Mr. G. Beck, who wrote his biography, “Mr. Austin-Sparks realized the deep need to be more fully incorporated
into the representation of the death of Christ. His view was that the death,
resurrection, and ascension are closely related to us as we are being
incorporated into Christ.”
A quarter of a century
later I am able to see that there was a bending away from that which was
acceptable Christian doctrine and mere teaching at that time, to something that
had greater subjective reality based on the revelation of Jesus Christ that he
had obtained. This is so significant because it had a tremendous impact upon
his ministry. Mr. Sparks writes in The
Nature and Purpose of this Ministry:
"This is where we ourselves were. Our
position was that of the generally accepted evangelical Christian world. All
the fundamentals of the evangelical faith were most surely believed and
preached. The system of denominations as 'regiments of the one army' (as it is
commonly put) was accepted, or more or less taken for granted. We were in one
of these regiments because we believed that it was as good as — or perhaps a
bit better than — the others. We had our Bible Schools and lectures, in which
we gave the substance, content, and — as we believed — the meaning of the
various parts of that sacred book. We were tremendously in earnest,
and not a bit lacking in evangelical zeal and passion. Much more could be said
about our enterprises and activities in work for God.
“How the crisis came about and what led to it
we should need to take all our available space to tell; suffice it to say that
the main factor was a deep and growing spiritual dissatisfaction and a
strengthening sense that there was something so much greater in the heart of
God than we had discovered. This led to a strong quest for all that He would
have us know. At length the crisis came, and that was done which answered the
cry of need and revolutionised everything. As we have
already said, it undercut Christianity as we had known it. That which happened
was an opening of our eyes, and the immediate result was that we saw that we
had hitherto never really seen. We had the doctrines, the statements, the
truths, the Scriptures, and we earnestly taught them. Then the thing happened
in us, and while the subject-matter of the Faith remained the same, we were
brought into a new world of life, light, liberty and fulness,
so that the power of the truth made all that world of difference. We date a
revolutionary divide from then, as to traditional Christianity with earnest
belief on the one hand, and a living experience of Christ in so much greater
meaning, with an open heaven, on the other hand."
The revelation of
Jesus Christ, our Lord, that Mr. Sparks received by the Spirit became the
fulcrum of his ministry and the main thrust of his own teaching. We are able to
see this reality in many of the books he wrote. Here are two examples:
Chapter 3 of The Lord's Testimony and the World Need
by T. Austin-Sparks. http://www.austin-sparks.net/english/books/001461.html
Chapter 4 of The Great Transition From One Humanity to
Another
http://www.austin-sparks.net/english/books/001484.html
Finally, I would like
to add that there is so much that we can learn from the ministry of T. Austin
Sparks. His endeavor was always to highlight the magnificence of the Lord,
Jesus Christ. His ministry emanated from the vision he received by the Spirit
of Christ regarding His body and the purpose of God for His church. It was not
something that was brewed in the understanding of contemporary teaching.
Dear Friend, have you
cried out to God to receive a vision of God's purpose? That will transform each
one of us even as it transformed Mr. Sparks.
Your
Friend in the mercies of the Lord,
Jasjit